Minnesota Association for the Education of Young Children


The mission of the Minnesota Association for the Education of Young Children is to promote the professional growth and development of those who are committed to the care and education of young children.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


MN Professional Development Council

 

 

Home > Resources

Minnesota Kindergarten Teacher Survey

Winter 1999

How are the Minnesota Graduation Standards Impacting Kindergarten Practice

1. How have you learned about using the Minnesota Graduation Standards in your classroom? Please check all that apply.

99% School inservice/faculty meetings 
84% District meetings 
58% Other teachers/administrators Families and Learning 
38% Self study
Education Minnesota (formerly MEA/MFT) 32% newsletter 7% conference
Minnesota Department of Children, 27% workshops 5% website
Other ways not mentioned above - 
Media: newspaper, TV, radio talk shows, internet
Professional organizations: Minnesota Kindergarten Association, MEEP convention
Committees/district inservices: Language Arts committee, Son's PAC meeting/ High School registration, IL meeting
Classes/courses/workshops: Graduate classes, Minnesota Center for the Arts
Involvement with Standards: Developed some, pilot site

1a. Which of these was the most helpful? Why?

School inservice/faculty meeting/district meeting: 51% 
Knowledgeable peers/presenters 
Able to discuss informally/dialogue 
Individualized to school/grade 
Worked in a large group to get the large picture, and made applications in small groups 
Ongoing work 
Other teachers/administrators: 8% 
Learned how to apply this to my classroom
Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning: 0% 
Knowledgeable instructor 
Specific activities for kindergarten 
Instructor's approach was "hands on" 
Other: We do not formally use the Graduation Standards in kindergarten 
They try to explain before everything is in place, so they are unable to answer questions 
Information changed with every meeting 
Not very relevant to kindergarten

2. The Basic Skills Tests and the Comprehensive Tests 
Minnesota students are required to take comprehensive tests in 3rd and 5th grades, and the basic skills test in 8th grade. Are these tests impacting what you do in kindergarten?

Yes 41%
No 55%

The Basic Skills Tests and the Comprehensive Tests ARE impacting what we do in kindergarten 
We are building the foundation for future learning in kindergarten. 
Skills are sequential, and we are building them each year.
There are positive outcomes from the testing:
We are relating curriculum to our district standards
We are adding more critical thinking and inquiry
There are more "hands on" activities, stressing application
We add more writing
We introduce vocabulary and processes needed later
Kindergarten teachers know what is included in the tests and they have been teaching it.

The Basic Skills tests and the Comprehensive Tests ARE NOT impacting what we do in kindergarten.
Experienced teacher report that they know what kindergarten children need
There is more pressure to teach academics and skills
We are moving away from developmentally appropriate practices
Kindergarten is an environment that supports individuals at their own learning rate
Districts have mandated the time I spend in teaching skills
Social Studies, Science, Music and Art are being left out
Kindergarten programs have always supported developmental learning for children

3. Impact upon your teaching 

Have the High Standards had a positive impact on your teaching? 
Yes 45% 
No 53%

3a. The High Standards have had a positive impact upon my teaching.

There is a broader range and depth of subject matter
The Standards challenge us to expect more
Parents are viewing school more seriously which shows in the children
They have forced us to develop new teaching strategies
They have raised teachers' consciousness about teaching and learning
They have helped guide curricular decisions

The High Standards have led to positive teaching and influenced the children's learning: 
Children's thinking is stretched 
Lessons and activities have built vocabulary 
Developed better questioning strategies 
We look at children as individuals 
Lessons built on what children know
Students demonstrate what they know
There is pressure to change

The Standards have encouraged professional growth: 
The Standards confirm what we have always done 
We are more organized and aware 
We question reasons for including certain areas of curriculum 
The Standards have led to important discussions among teachers 
The standards have caused us to reevaluate what we do

3b. Have the High Standards had a negative impact on your teaching?
Yes 27%
No 66%

The High Standards HAVE HAD a negative impact on my teaching
They encourage questionable practices in kindergarten
Kindergarten becomes a mini first grade
There is less time for socialization and play
Teachers are unable to teach Themes
Students may think they are failures
Now we have a reading series for kindergarten
Stress is placed on teachers and children
District expectations are too difficult for young children
Children are not ready for imposed curriculum
There is pressure to change

In addition the High Standards have had a negative impact on teachers: 
Too much assessment is required 
There is too much inservice 
It is discouraging to learn that CFL doesn't think we're doing good work 
There is too much required 
The morale of staff is so low 
There is pressure from upper grades 
There is not enough time and support to figure it out 
They require kindergarten teachers to do too much, especially in half day program

3c. Have the High Standards influenced your students, learning? 
Yes 25% 
No 65%

The High Standards have positively influences my student's learning.
Students are having more opportunities to learn or be involved with components of the High Standards:
They may draw or write about solutions
They have opportunities to have more in depth study with topics
They read more nonfiction
They do more estimation and tallying
They can demonstrate their learning through a variety of assessments
There is greater emphasis on student accountability and responsibility

The High Standards have not influenced the student's learning. 
Experienced teachers feel that present practices are appropriate 
Teachers' perceptions that the High Standards do not meet individual students' needs 
Teachers feel that they are locked in to prescribed curriculum

Additional comments for discussion:

We need full day every day kindergarten
Kindergarten teachers have always been performance based
I feel fortunate not to have to complete Packages
The Standards have not yet impacted my teaching
The High Standards, the ten areas of learning, happen in kindergarten all the time
I think the Early Childhood Standards are much more appropriate for kindergarten and first grade
There is "nothing new"

4. The High Standards (The Profile of Learning)

Have you considered the 10 areas of learning when planning your curriculum?
69% Yes
25% No

Below are the primary standards (K-3). Please indicate the level of use: 
Rate: 1 (never) 2 (somewhat) 3 (more than once) 4 (often) 

Learning Area One: Read, View and Listen 

Rating scale: 1 (never)=3% 2 (somewhat)=17% 3 (more than once)=10% 4 (often)=69%

A student shall demonstrate comprehension of literal meaning through
reading, viewing or listening to nonfiction and fiction selections.
A student shall interpret and evaluate information from age-appropriate
nonfiction and fiction selections by reading, viewing and listening.

Learning Area Two: Write and Speak

Rating scale: 1 (never)=10% 2 (somewhat)=25% 3 (more than once)=25% 4 (often)=39%
A student shall demonstrate the ability to write and speak for a variety of academic and technical purposes.

Learning Area Three: The Arts 

Rating scale: 1 (never)=29% 2 (somewhat)=43% 3 (more than once)=17% 4 (often)=9%
A student shall describe at least three of the art forms; dance, visual art, music, theater using the vocabulary of the art form and identifying similarities and differences between forms.

Learning Area Four: Mathematical Applications

Rating scale: 1 (never)=4% 2 (somewhat)=20% 3 (more than once)=20% 4 (often)=54%

Number sense: A student shall use number relationships to represent information and solve problems. 
Shape, Space and Measurement: A student shall apply concepts of shape, space and measurement to solve problems involving two and three dimensional shapes.

Learning Area Five: Inquiry

Rating scale:1 (never)=3% 2 (somewhat)=25% 3 (more than once)=25% 4 (often)=47%
A student shall demonstrate the ability to categorize, classify and record information.

Learning Area Six: Applied Scientific Methods

Rating scale: 1 (never)=7% 2 (somewhat)=31% 3 (more than once)=35% 4 (often)=25%
A student shall demonstrate knowledge of basic science concepts of physical science, life science and earth and space science through direct experience.

Learning Area Seven: People and Culture 

Rating scale: 1 (never)=5% 2 (somewhat)=31% 3 (more than once)=31% 4 (often)=33%
A student shall demonstrate knowledge of the interaction of location, family, school and community.

Learning Area Eight: Decision Making- Personal Health and Fitness

Rating scale: 1 (never)=8% 2 (somewhat)=22% 3 (more than once)=32% 4 (often)=38%
A student shall demonstrate an understanding of activities that promote personal fitness, health, nutrition, and safety.

Learning Area Nine: Resource Management- Introduction to Technology

Rating scale: 1 (never)=21% 2 (somewhat)=31% 3 (more than once)=25% 4 (often)=22%
A student shall use appropriate computer technology to access information and to produce products.

Learning Area Ten: World Languages 

Rating scale: 1 (never)=39% 2 (somewhat)=45% 3 (more than once)=5% 4 (often)=9% 
Communicate in a language other than English.

4a. My district is not requiring kindergarten teachers to use the High Standards. 36% (check if true) 

Comments: 
I am required to work in all areas.
Kindergarten teachers are required to be familiar with the Ten Areas of Learning and provide age-appropriate activities.

5. Performance Packages 

The performance packages are lessons and assessment ideas written at the third grade level for teachers to use with their students. Below is the list of the names of the Primary Performance Packages. Please write your level of use for each on the line: 
1(never), 2(looked at), 3(used part/adapted), 4(completed)

__Author Study 1 (never)= 39%, 2 (looked at)= 9%, 3 (used part/adapted)=16%, 4 (completed)=0

__Board Game 1 (never)= 50% , 2 (looked at)= 8% , 3 (used part/adapted)=3%, 4 (completed)= 0

__Book Illustration 1 (never)= 45%, 2 (looked at)= 8%, 3 (used part/adapted)= 6%, 4 (completed) =0

__Can a Sinker Float? 1 (never)= 34% , 2 (looked at)= 8%, 3 (used part/adapted)=22%, 4 (completed)= 0

__Gift Wrap and Postage 1 (never)= 41%, 2 (looked at)= 13%, 22% 3 (used part/adapted)=8% , 4 (completed)= 0

__Hand in Hand Stamp 1 (never)= 50%, 2 (looked at)= 8%, 3 (used part/adapted)= 0, 4 (completed)= 0

__Marker Combinations & Square Numbers 1 (never)= 54%, 2 (looked at)= 4%, 3 (used part/adapted)= 5%, 4 (completed)= 0

__Method Improvising 1 (never)= 58% , 2 (looked at)= 1%, 3 (used part/adapted)= 0 , 4 (completed)= 0

__Planning and Carrying Out & Invest 1 (never)= 55%, 2 (looked at)= 3%, 3 (used part/adapted)= 4%, 4 (completed)= 0

__Properties of Earth 1 (never)= 50% , 2 (looked at)= 6%, 3 (used part/adapted)=4%, 4 (completed)= 0

__Rhythm & Poetry 1 (never)= 46%, 2 (looked at)= 3%, 3 (used part/adapted)=10%, 4 (completed)= 0

__Sunrise and Sunset Objects Journal 1 (never)= 60%, 2 (looked at)= 0, 3 (used part/adapted)= 0, 4 (completed)= 0

__Systematic Observation 1 (never)= 49%, 2 (looked at)= 8%, 3 (used part/adapted)=2%, 4 (completed)= 0

__Tally Sheet 1 (never)= 41%, 2 (looked at)= 13%, 3 (used part/adapted)=12%, 4 (completed)= 0

__Technology 1 (never)= 49%, 2 (looked at)= 7%, 3 (used part/adapted)= 8%, 4 (completed)= 0

__The Food Pyramid 1 (never)= 34%, 2 (looked at)= 13%, 3 (used part/adapted)=14%, 4 (completed)= 5%

__Watching the News 1 (never)= 52%, 2 (looked at)= 7%, 3 (used part/adapted)=2%, 4 (completed)= 0

__Wolves-Fact and Fiction 1 (never)= 49%, 2 (looked at)= 8%, 3 (used part/adapted)= 4%, 4 (completed)= 0

__Word Processing 1 (never)= 53%, 2 (looked at)= 4%, 3 (used part/adapted)=3%, 4 (completed)= 0

__Dramatizing a Story, Fable or Folktale 1 (never)= 34%, 2 (looked at)= 10%, 3 (used part/adapted)=17% 4 (completed)= 0

__Exploring Language 1 (never)= 56%, 2 (looked at)= 3%, 3 (used part/adapted)= 2%, 4 (completed)= 0

__Food Chains 1 (never)= 47%, 2 (looked at)= 8%, 3 (used part/adapted)=5%, 4 (completed)= 0

__Marvelous Music 1 (never)= 54%, 2 (looked at)= 5%, 3 (used part/adapted)=0, 4 (completed)= 0

__Personal Symbol-Making Project 1 (never)= 60%, 2 (looked at)= 1%, 3 (used part/adapted)= 0, 4 (completed)= 0

__The Shapes and Colors of Dance 1 (never)= 50%, 2 (looked at)= 5%, 3 (used part/adapted)=3%, 4 (completed)= 0

__Story Quilt 1 (never)= 50%, 2 (looked at)= 8%, 3 (used part/adapted)=3%, 4 (completed)= 0

__Writing and Speak 1 (never)= 51%, 2 (looked at)= 8%, 3 (used part/adapted)= 10%, 4 (completed)= 0

5a. Has your district required you to complete any entire package/s? 
Yes 7% 
No 86%

Which one/s? 
We adapted some of the existing Packages. 
We are not required to do Packages. 
Packages are not appropriate in kindergarten.

5b. Have you created performance packages which you use with your students? 
Yes 11% 
No 80%

Please describe: 

Winter was created for the Minneapolis kindergarten teachers 
Why are you asking me about 3rd grade requirements? 
We have created appropriate tasks for kindergarten children
We have modified or adapted existing Packages.

Additional comments: 

Great to have High Standards, but forget the Performance Packages.

Survey Background: 500 surveys were mailed to a random sample of the 1,784 Minnesota public school kindergarten teachers. 131 were returned. Some teachers included examples of Performance Packages they have adapted for use in kindergarten. They will be added to this website by June 1. This project was funded by a Membership Action Grant offered by the National Association for the Education of Young Children. Thank you to all of the kindergarten teachers who responded to the survey. For further information about this survey, please contact:

Gretchen Kranz Irvine, Augsburg College, 2211 Riverside Ave. , Minneapolis, MN 55454 
612-330-1315 
irvine@augsburg.edu

Betsy Halden, Macalester College, 1600 Grand Ave., St. Paul, MN 55106 
651-696-6327
halden@macalester.edu
 


The MnAEYC's Web site is available solely in English at the present time. However, several Internet sites offer free translation tools to users who wish to view our Web site in another language. The following sites provide translations from English to a number of other languages including: Chinese, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Russian and Spanish."

AltaVista Babelfish Translation http://babelfish.altavista.com/
Prompt's Online Translator http://www.translate.ru/

The Mn AEYC assumes no responsibility for the availability or accuracy of the translation Web sites to which we provide links.

 

aeyc-mn.org Search WWW Google

Minnesota Association for the Education of Young Children
1821 University Ave., Suite 298-S, St. Paul, MN 55104
651-646-8689 651-646-4514 Fax